Comments on: SQL Server: The truth about TABLE WITH (NOLOCK) https://www.dbrnd.com/2016/12/sql-server-the-truth-about-table-with-nolock-select-read-uncommitted-data/ BIGData | NoSQL | MSSQL | MySQL | PostgreSQL Wed, 04 Jan 2017 19:14:09 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4 By: Anvesh Patel https://www.dbrnd.com/2016/12/sql-server-the-truth-about-table-with-nolock-select-read-uncommitted-data/#comment-5453 Wed, 04 Jan 2017 19:14:09 +0000 https://www.dbrnd.com/?p=2091#comment-5453 In reply to Ayush.

No any performance impact. Both are same and if possible please remove WITH (NOLOCK).

]]> By: Ayush https://www.dbrnd.com/2016/12/sql-server-the-truth-about-table-with-nolock-select-read-uncommitted-data/#comment-5451 Wed, 04 Jan 2017 06:55:32 +0000 https://www.dbrnd.com/?p=2091#comment-5451 Hi Anvesh,

As in our company we are using the READ UNCOMMITED isolation level.

So if they are using WITH (NOLOCK) also with each table.So will it impact the performance of my Query.

Thanks,

]]>