<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: SQL Server: Implement Table Partition in Non Enterprise Edition (Use Partitioned View)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dbrnd.com/2017/09/sql-server-implement-table-partition-in-non-enterprise-edition-use-partitioned-view/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dbrnd.com/2017/09/sql-server-implement-table-partition-in-non-enterprise-edition-use-partitioned-view/</link>
	<description>BIGData &#124; NoSQL &#124; MSSQL &#124; MySQL &#124; PostgreSQL</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 06:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anvesh Patel		</title>
		<link>https://www.dbrnd.com/2017/09/sql-server-implement-table-partition-in-non-enterprise-edition-use-partitioned-view/#comment-5993</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anvesh Patel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 06:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dbrnd.com/?p=6022#comment-5993</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dbrnd.com/2017/09/sql-server-implement-table-partition-in-non-enterprise-edition-use-partitioned-view/#comment-5992&quot;&gt;Kevin&lt;/a&gt;.

Now, I have to check in detail...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, I have to check in detail&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kevin		</title>
		<link>https://www.dbrnd.com/2017/09/sql-server-implement-table-partition-in-non-enterprise-edition-use-partitioned-view/#comment-5992</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 23:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dbrnd.com/?p=6022#comment-5992</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Anvesh -- I have the same question as O_Mine, but the link you provided doesn&#039;t really answer the question. It shows how to put an INSTEAD OF trigger on a view, but it doesn&#039;t provide an illustration involving a SEQUENCE. Inserting the columns from &quot;inserted&quot; plus the NEXT VALUE FOR [sequence] AS [ID_Column] results in 0 rows inserted every time. What are we doing wrong?

Thanks for a great article, and any help you can provide.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anvesh &#8212; I have the same question as O_Mine, but the link you provided doesn&#8217;t really answer the question. It shows how to put an INSTEAD OF trigger on a view, but it doesn&#8217;t provide an illustration involving a SEQUENCE. Inserting the columns from &#8220;inserted&#8221; plus the NEXT VALUE FOR [sequence] AS [ID_Column] results in 0 rows inserted every time. What are we doing wrong?</p>
<p>Thanks for a great article, and any help you can provide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anvesh Patel		</title>
		<link>https://www.dbrnd.com/2017/09/sql-server-implement-table-partition-in-non-enterprise-edition-use-partitioned-view/#comment-5949</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anvesh Patel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 19:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dbrnd.com/?p=6022#comment-5949</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dbrnd.com/2017/09/sql-server-implement-table-partition-in-non-enterprise-edition-use-partitioned-view/#comment-5947&quot;&gt;O Mine&lt;/a&gt;.

Yes possible. 
Please visit this official - https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/def01zh2.aspx]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes possible.<br />
Please visit this official &#8211; <a href="https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/def01zh2.aspx" rel="nofollow ugc">https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/def01zh2.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: O Mine		</title>
		<link>https://www.dbrnd.com/2017/09/sql-server-implement-table-partition-in-non-enterprise-edition-use-partitioned-view/#comment-5947</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[O Mine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dbrnd.com/?p=6022#comment-5947</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is there a way to also implement an &quot;INSTEAD OF INSERT trigger&quot; on the view that eliminates the need to specify &quot;NEXT VALUE FOR dbo.seq_ProductHistory&quot; in the insert statements?  Trying to retrofit partitioned view onto a database with a 1TB table (not DB, table) and would like for existing code to not need to change.  Existing code thinks of the ID column as an identity and doesn&#039;t specify a value for it....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a way to also implement an &#8220;INSTEAD OF INSERT trigger&#8221; on the view that eliminates the need to specify &#8220;NEXT VALUE FOR dbo.seq_ProductHistory&#8221; in the insert statements?  Trying to retrofit partitioned view onto a database with a 1TB table (not DB, table) and would like for existing code to not need to change.  Existing code thinks of the ID column as an identity and doesn&#8217;t specify a value for it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
